| i know. but seems that |
| 送交者: 要飯花子 2009月04月11日11:00:35 於 [教育學術] 發送悄悄話 |
| 回 答: It's a special case versus 由 定理 於 2009-04-11 10:18:52 |
|
you still need to assume 'among right triangles, two of them are said congruent iff their two sides are respectively of equal length'
to be a definition or a postulate in the proof in 《周髀算經》. i can also take 'among arbitrary triangles, two of them are said congruent iff their two sides are respectively of equal length and the angles in between are equal' as a definition or a postulate in Euclid's proof. the only difference is the angle. |
|
![]() | ||
|
![]() |
| 實用資訊 | |
|
|
| 一周點擊熱帖 | 更多>> |
| 一周回復熱帖 |
| 歷史上的今天:回復熱帖 |
| 2007: | 一個沉重的話題 | |
| 2007: | 安立春就公開信事件的幾點說明。 | |
| 2005: | 國際化趨勢中的高等教育公平問題 | |
| 2005: | 美國的窮人窮到什麼程度? | |






