多虧了FXX，我才看了自然雜誌的社論。看過之後，對其無知，愚蠢感到鎮驚。

”那麼，如果中醫藥是那麼偉大的話，為什麼對其結果的定性研究沒有為眾多
治療打開方便之門呢？最明顯的答案是，它實際上沒有多少可提供的：它基本上
不過是偽科學，它的大多數療法沒有合理的機制。中醫擁護者反駁說，研究者沒
有掌握其奧妙，特別是傳統療法中不同成分之間的相互作用。“

”So if traditional Chinese medicine is so great, why hasn't the
qualitative study of its outcomes opened the door to a flood of cures?
The most obvious answer is that it actually has little to offer: it is
largely just pseudoscience, with no rational mechanism of action for
most of its therapies. Advocates respond by claiming that researchers
are missing aspects of the art, notably the interactions between
different ingredients in traditional therapies.“

我想問問它，什麼是偽科學？中醫藥為什麼是偽科學？我看自然雜誌可能面對法律訴訟，好戲來了。