A
Statement of C. Y. Lo
I am a scientist, who has spent 23 years
to study Einstein’s general relativity. I would like to share my results with
others.
My two major conclusions are:
1. Einstein’s equation has no dynamic
solution, in spite of the claim of Einstein. Thus, Einstein is wrong, and needs
rectification, but A. Gullstrand, the Chairman (1922-1929) of the Nobel
Committee for Physics is right.
2. Einstein’s conjecture of unification,
in contrast to the opinions of many experts, is correct since the charge-mass
interaction has been found and verified. Thus, Einstein is benefited by my
rectification.
These two new findings would create lots
of new jobs, both theoretical and experimental. However, since even Einstein is
wrong, the theoretical establishment is deeply shaken. Probably, they also make
more than 80% of those working on general relativity related problems lose
their job or the prestige as an expert. Thus, although my work has the
theoretical and experimental supports, the establishment stonewalled my work. I
am a graduate of MIT. When Professor P. Morrison was alive, I got support from
him in spite of the odds against the majority. After P. Morrison passed away, I
also get stonewalled from the Physics Department because I exposed their
ignorance on general relativity.
However, the MIT administration has a
more open attitude because in 2007 when they tried to have a conference with
the Chinese in Beijing
on gravitation, I informed them that there are problems in current theories of
general relativity. What I heard later is that the meeting was postponed
indefinitely. Apparently, these problems have not been settled yet.
The current theorists always loose their arguments with me, although
they have sent the perceived most capable applied mathematician ‘t Hooft for
the job. Then, they change their attitude of challenge to stonewall my work.
This also becomes the attitude of most physicists working on the field of
gravitation because they know that they cannot win. However, their own interest
is to keep the wrong theory. For the progress in physics, it seems that the
only way out is to have an open conference to settle the issues publicly.
It is possible that some theorists would be
against an open debate. To settle them, I would suggest that they should challenge
me with emails.
