設萬維讀者為首頁 廣告服務 技術服務 聯繫我們 關於萬維
簡體 繁體 手機版
分類廣告
版主:奇異恩典
萬維讀者網 > 彩虹之約 > 跟帖
oh puh-lease
送交者: mean 2008月10月10日07:07:07 於 [彩虹之約] 發送悄悄話
回  答: It is common senseYuehanmiao 於 2008-10-10 06:15:43
the timing of the A-bomb was such that no one was really saved. that the bombing stopped japanese from killing millions of chinese is a myth at best, one that you obviously have bought.

"...Japan was already defeated and that dropping the bomb was completely unnecessary." Dwight D. Eisenhower, Supreme Commander of the Allied Forces in Europe and future president of the United States.

"The Japanese position was hopeless even before the first atomic bomb fell because the Japanese had lost control of their own air." Henry H. Arnold, Commanding General of the U.S. Army Air Forces.

"The Japanese had, in fact, already sued for peace. The atomic bomb played no decisive part, from a purely military point of view, in the defeat of Japan." Fleet Admiral Chester W. Nimitz, Commander in Chief of the U.S. Pacific Fleet.

"The use of [the atomic bombs] at Hiroshima and Nagasaki was of no material assistance in our war against Japan. The Japanese were already defeated and ready to surrender." Fleet Admiral William D. Leahy, Chief of Staff to President Truman.

"Certainly prior to 31 December 1945, and in all probability prior to 1 November 1945, Japan would have surrendered even if the atomic bombs had not been dropped." U.S. Strategic Bombing Survey.

as I have stated before, I don't disagree with the decision to drop the bombs, from a strategic standpoint, which is probably why the bombs were dropped in the first place. but to defend it from a moralistic and religious point of view, is ludicrous at best.
0%(0)
0%(0)
  if your reasons are sound - Yuehanmiao 10/10/08 (200)
    which part of this stmt - mean 10/10/08 (204)
標  題 (必選項):
內  容 (選填項):
實用資訊
回國機票$360起 | 商務艙省$200 | 全球最佳航空公司出爐:海航獲五星
海外華人福利!在線看陳建斌《三叉戟》熱血歸回 豪情築夢 高清免費看 無地區限制
一周點擊熱帖 更多>>
一周回復熱帖
歷史上的今天:回復熱帖
2006: 樓下的同網們
2006: zt: 六旬老太道口勇救三女童 捨己救人
2005: 拖累症的表現:
2005: Letting Go “放手” 修正版