他们不但传的是极端加尔文主义的观点，而且还气势汹汹。苗还经常拿什么十大文件糊弄人。

改革宗讲两意论，即上帝的确有愿万人悔改的意愿，这里的万人指的是所有人，同时耶稣也只爱他的子民。即拣选的子民,他只为选民死，多特信经讲的很清楚。

这两者看上去是有矛盾，但这是圣经启示的，你没办法用理性去和谐他们。只偏向前面的观点，会造成普救论的异端，只偏向后面，会失去传福音的动力。

以上观点摘自改革宗王一牧师海德堡要理讲座。

那么怎么办？霍顿说：最保险的办法是都讲。

（https://www.ligonier.org/learn/articles/reformed-theology-vs-hyper-calvinism/）

Both Arminians and hyper-Calvinists ignore crucial passages of Scripture, resolving the mystery in favor of the either-or: either election or the free offer of the Gospel.

The wisdom of the Reformed confessions is that they refuse to speculate beyond Scripture and insist on proclaiming the whole counsel of God, not simply the passages that seem to reinforce one-sided emphases. It is not a question of where the logic should lead us but where the Scriptures do lead us. It might be easier to resolve the mystery in simple, either-or solutions, but such a course would certainly not be safer. So let us too strive to read all of the Scriptures together, keeping a sharp lookout for those guardrails!