設萬維讀者為首頁 廣告服務 聯繫我們 關於萬維
簡體 繁體 手機版
分類廣告
版主:股民甲遠古的風
萬維讀者網 > 股市財經 > 帖子
On averaging
送交者: jingchen 2018年08月14日07:18:48 於 [股市財經] 發送悄悄話

On averaging 

You swim across the lake. It is three km and takes one hour. You return to where you started. It takes you another hour. Together it takes you two hours.

You swim down the river for three km, then return to where you started. When you swim down, you go with the flow. It will take less than an hour. When you swim up , you go against the flow. It will take more than an hour. The average speed, though, is still three km per hour. So the total time of swimming down and up is still two hours.

Some people might feel a little bit uncomfortable about the above argument. Let’s do some detailed calculation. Suppose the speed of water flow is two km per hour. When one swims down, the total speed of moving is 3 + 2 = 5 km/hour. It will take 3/5 hour to swim three km downstream. When one swims up, the total speed of moving is 3 - 2 = 1 km/hour. It will take 3/1 = 3 hour to swim three km upstream. Together, it will take more than three hours to finish the round trip. From the calculation, and from the practical experience as well, the faster the river flow, the longer it takes to finish the round trip. 

Mathematically speaking, we cannot average denominators. It is not a linear relation. One might say this is obvious and trivial. It is obvious and trivial, except that averaging denominators is widely practiced in finance. It is called WACC (weighted average cost of capital), one of the most important concepts in finance. It is taught to every finance student and used in valuing billions after billions of assets worldwide.

The theoretical foundation of WACC was first developed by Modigliani and Miller. They both received Noble prizes. They proved that when expected return from the investment is constant to perpetuity, WACC does provide the correct answer. This is equivalent to prove that when the speed of water flow is zero, the time to take a round trip in the river is the same as the time to take a round trip in the lake with the same distance. But this is the only case when the statement is valid, in finance or in swimming. 

Modigliani and Miller wrote the paper in 1958, sixty years ago. Their paper has become a bible in finance. Is it sin to discuss the validity of bible? You be the judge!

For more information, please refer to 

On the scope of validity of Modigliani and Miller propositions
http://web.unbc.ca/~chenj/papers/WACC.pdf


0%(0)
0%(0)
標 題 (必選項):
內 容 (選填項):
實用資訊
回國機票$360起 | 商務艙省$200 | 全球最佳航空公司出爐:海航獲五星
海外華人福利!在線看陳建斌《三叉戟》熱血歸回 豪情築夢 高清免費看 無地區限制
一周點擊熱帖 更多>>
一周回復熱帖
歷史上的今天:回復熱帖
2016: 第十二屆股壇大師賽金牌榜【第6周】
2016: 交易員實戰8月第3周計劃
2015: 美國股市/ 道瓊斯指數1-4波段 14-8-20
2015: 中國股市/ 上證指數1-4波段 17-8-2015
2014: 黎則奮:香港金融危機風險 根源來自大
2013: 做房貸要貨比三家,更要會討價還價
2013: 中國30年物價上漲了多少倍?