设万维读者为首页 广告服务 技术服务 联系我们 关于万维
简体 繁体 手机版
分类广告
版主:阿飞的剑
万维读者网 > 茗香茶语 > 跟帖
That seems to be the standard
送交者: EmitEht 2009月03月25日11:12:01 于 [茗香茶语] 发送悄悄话
回  答: 这个分歧,很难解说得掉。唯一的说法是逾越节大餐在不同的日子里定理 于 2009-03-25 10:53:14
explanation. And this explanation might not be entirely groundless.

Mark was written much earlier than John. The author of John (supposedly John the apostle himself) must have read Mark, and John was a traditional jew, so he used the traditional and standard passover meal as a time reference for the crucifixion. Otherwise, John should be aware of the inconsistency and would have avoided it.

I am not a defender of the infallibility of the Bible. In fact, I believe the Bible was written by people and is full of inconsistencies and errors.

hehe
0%(0)
0%(0)
标  题 (必选项):
内  容 (选填项):
实用资讯
回国机票$360起 | 商务舱省$200 | 全球最佳航空公司出炉:海航获五星
海外华人福利!在线看陈建斌《三叉戟》热血归回 豪情筑梦 高清免费看 无地区限制
一周点击热帖 更多>>
一周回复热帖
历史上的今天:回复热帖
2008: 只有汉藏两族大规模仇杀了,他们才会心
2008: 骚乱早已平息,西方继续狂煽
2007: 大陆博士舌战台独博士:「Yankee」和「
2006: 关于爱情 之 鸟影
2005: 血缘:第十四章 多少爱无根无脉 (2)
2005: 评“日本的普罗和中国的普罗”
2004: 痴人说梦
2004: 一口闲钟 作者:简媜