設萬維讀者為首頁 廣告服務 技術服務 聯繫我們 關於萬維
簡體 繁體 手機版
分類廣告
版主:阿飛的劍
萬維讀者網 > 茗香茶語 > 跟帖
That seems to be the standard
送交者: EmitEht 2009月03月25日11:12:01 於 [茗香茶語] 發送悄悄話
回  答: 這個分歧,很難解說得掉。唯一的說法是逾越節大餐在不同的日子裡定理 於 2009-03-25 10:53:14
explanation. And this explanation might not be entirely groundless.

Mark was written much earlier than John. The author of John (supposedly John the apostle himself) must have read Mark, and John was a traditional jew, so he used the traditional and standard passover meal as a time reference for the crucifixion. Otherwise, John should be aware of the inconsistency and would have avoided it.

I am not a defender of the infallibility of the Bible. In fact, I believe the Bible was written by people and is full of inconsistencies and errors.

hehe
0%(0)
0%(0)
標  題 (必選項):
內  容 (選填項):
實用資訊
回國機票$360起 | 商務艙省$200 | 全球最佳航空公司出爐:海航獲五星
海外華人福利!在線看陳建斌《三叉戟》熱血歸回 豪情築夢 高清免費看 無地區限制
一周點擊熱帖 更多>>
一周回復熱帖
歷史上的今天:回復熱帖
2008: 只有漢藏兩族大規模仇殺了,他們才會心
2008: 騷亂早已平息,西方繼續狂煽
2007: 大陸博士舌戰台獨博士:「Yankee」和「
2006: 關於愛情 之 鳥影
2005: 血緣:第十四章 多少愛無根無脈 (2)
2005: 評“日本的普羅和中國的普羅”
2004: 痴人說夢
2004: 一口閒鍾 作者:簡媜