1. 我觉的乔治.克鲁尼所谓的要求该品牌向中国政府的“对外政策”施压是没错的.这也符合乔治.克鲁尼的一关表先.看看他的几不电影, Syriana, Good Night, and Good Luck都是在针贬时政(你别和我将他的Ocean's系列).还记得他在1996 Oscar acceptance speech 是讲的话吧:

“And finally, I would say that, you know, we are a little bit out of touch in Hollywood every once in a while, I think. It’s probably a good thing. Uhm, we’re the ones who talk about AIDS when it was just being whispered. And we talked about civil rights when it wasn’t really popular. And we, uh, you know, we bring up subjects…we are the ones…this Academy, this group of people gave Hattie McDaniel an Oscar in 1939 when blacks were still sitting in the backs of theaters. I’m proud to be a part of this Academy. I’m proud to be part of this community. I’m proud to be out of touch. And I thank you so much for this.”

之前,没人那他当瓣蒜.主要和他的型像/表现有关.

向他这样的人如过达尔富尔不表态导师不正长了.先不论他就达尔富尔的认识是不是正确.

2. 现在讨论达尔富尔问题.西方舆论说达尔富尔问题是A, 中方说达尔富尔问题是B. 但在西方国家生活的人只听到A, 几乎听不到B. 在中国生活的人只听到B, 几乎听不到A. 这是典型的in????ation asymmetry. Based on 着些 info而的出不同的结论也不足围棋.问题是中宣部只会对内封杀.妈的,对外就是不作为.也没发指望这些W8D.对此我好有一比.
你没发指望一个强奸犯学会调情.也就是说一个强权政府是没法达到一个选举政府做事那样的sophistications.你有不同的意见,Stalin 是把你喀碴了, Roosevelt是用尽心思把你你的一见该边了/marginized.水平高低立见.

3. 现在国内的人听不来任何不同意见.其实就奥运会而言,如果是在美国举行,你认为就消停了?不说别的,光反战的就会天天闹.但多数人不会说着是…听进不同意见你如何进步? 越临进奥运会,各种人都会要出来张显各自的诉求.这再正常不过了.人家先在不出来何时出来?