Reasoning without logic? |
送交者: 言真輕 2009月02月27日12:34:37 於 [教育學術] 發送悄悄話 |
回 答: You mixed up things again! 由 空軍大院 於 2009-02-27 12:04:46 |
Does rational people need to be logical in their reasonings as well? If a person is not logical, how could you say s/he is rational? I am totally confused here. Traditional Chinese way of thinking is not logical, so I can only say that traditionally Chinese had tried very hard to be rational, but they just could not. Because, they failed to develop something called logics. 所謂的“白馬非馬”論,曾被用來證明中國古代人有邏輯思維。
這也太牽強附會了,“白馬非馬”在我看來最多了是一種詭辯,而且是基於漢字這種落後文字的狡辯。它和同時代的用字母文字思維並表達的亞里士多德,不僅不能在思維深度上比,在語言表述上也是無可比之處的。 |
|
|
|
|
實用資訊 | |
|
|
一周點擊熱帖 | 更多>> |
|
|
一周回復熱帖 |
|
歷史上的今天:回復熱帖 |
2008: | ZT: 話說何祚庥(I) | |
2008: | ZT: 話說何祚庥(II) | |
2007: | 在美國沒本事的人不敢學醫 | |
2007: | 追憶我的老師華羅庚-為人民服務的數學 | |
2006: | 談談上海交大出陳進一類人物的必然 | |
2006: | 對草根“無神論者。。。” 的看法 | |
2005: | 寒冰: 中國今天的西化到底為了誰? | |
2004: | 談談文章的水平 | |
2004: | 誰動了北大的奶酪 | |