| modeling to me is to deal with |
| 送交者: 空军大院 2009月04月08日10:40:42 于 [教育学术] 发送悄悄话 |
| 回 答: your absolutism 由 定理 于 2009-04-08 10:05:54 |
|
FINITE world, or part of a system, or something like that - if my understanding of yours is correct. But my system is to deal with EVERYTHING as a whole. This is philosophy stuff, not a branch of practical science, do I make myself clear to you? Philosophy, like religion, trys to explain the WHOLE, the ONE, the UNIQUE, the BEING... Modeling is certainly not the same kind of stuff. So i really don't get it why you insist that they two should be guided with the same criteria?
|
|
![]() | |||||||
|
![]() |
| 实用资讯 | |
|
|
| 一周点击热帖 | 更多>> |
| 一周回复热帖 |
| 历史上的今天:回复热帖 |
| 2006: | 中国不诚实的代价太小,报酬太高 | |
| 2006: | 诚实的代价 (The Price for Being Hone | |
| 2005: | 一格一格降人才: 精英教育的困境 | |
| 2005: | 题海战术: 中国学生的ACM竞赛冠军 | |
| 2004: | 公司大学:对大学理念的重新定义 | |
| 2004: | 牛津大学是否甘败涂地? | |







