| come on, Doc Hua, u commit |
| 送交者: 空軍大院 2009月04月24日09:01:01 於 [教育學術] 發送悄悄話 |
| 回 答: that's not a definition 由 要飯花子 於 2009-04-24 08:53:49 |
|
the same felony again! i am defining a necessary condition here! Euclid can define a "point" as having no parts, right? Can you tell him that "you did not say if the point has no lines in it either", can you?
|
|
|
|
|
 | ||||||
|
 |
| 實用資訊 | |
|
|
|
|
| 一周點擊熱帖 | 更多>> |
|
|
|
| 一周回復熱帖 |
|
|
| 歷史上的今天：回復熱帖 |
| 2007: | 蓋茨對清華與北大的評價zt | |
| 2007: | 清華大學講席教授制度回顧zt | |
| 2006: | 誠信缺失困擾學術殿堂 | |
| 2004: | 植物研究所更名的若干思考 | |
