| come on, Doc Hua, u commit |
| 送交者: 空军大院 2009月04月24日09:01:01 于 [教育学术] 发送悄悄话 |
| 回 答: that's not a definition 由 要饭花子 于 2009-04-24 08:53:49 |
|
the same felony again! i am defining a necessary condition here! Euclid can define a "point" as having no parts, right? Can you tell him that "you did not say if the point has no lines in it either", can you?
|
|
|
|
|
 | ||||||
|
 |
| 实用资讯 | |
|
|
|
|
| 一周点击热帖 | 更多>> |
|
|
|
| 一周回复热帖 |
|
|
| 历史上的今天：回复热帖 |
| 2007: | 盖茨对清华与北大的评价zt | |
| 2007: | 清华大学讲席教授制度回顾zt | |
| 2006: | 诚信缺失困扰学术殿堂 | |
| 2004: | 植物研究所更名的若干思考 | |
