丘成桐在Poincare猜想證明中的貢獻是丁院士賴得掉的嗎？

丁院士還是中國幾何分析創新群體小組的帶頭人，請問丁院士難道不知道丘是現代幾何分析方法的創始人？
人家Perelman在2002年的第一篇arXiv文章引用的28篇文章中，Hamilton有10篇，丘成桐1篇，丘的學生曹懷東和周培能4篇。
曹懷東、周培能、S.C.Chu（周的學生）、丘成桐在2003年6月1日共同編輯的《Collected Papers on Ricci Flow》一書的出版描述中寫到：
“The Ricci flow is currently a hot topic at the forefront of mathematics research. Ricci flow as an approach to the Geometrization Conjecture has recently received attention in the press with articles appearing in The New York Times and other popular newspapers and magazines. The NY Times article refers to recent work of Grisha Perelman on Richard Hamilton's program for Ricci flow as an approach to Thurston's Geometrization Conjecture.

In the past two decades the Ricci flow, and particularly Richard Hamilton's work, has received attention as both having a profound influence on geometric evolution equations and as a possible approach to studying Thurston's Geometrization Conjecture. This selection of papers on the Riemannian Ricci flow is intended for a variety of purposes. The graduate student or researcher unfamiliar with the Ricci flow may use it as an introduction to the Ricci flow quickly leading to current research topics and open problems. Geometers already familiar with the Ricci flow may use it as a handy reference which contains almost all of Richard Hamilton's papers on the subject to date (2002).
The recent developments of Grisha Perelman on Richard Hamilton's program for Ricci flow are exciting. And our collection is intended to make readily available, in one book, the work of Hamilton and others on Ricci flow to a wider audience. ”

丁院士和田剛院士不可能不知道這本Ricci Liu的基本讀物吧？
這最後一句話說：
“最近Grisha Perelman關於Richanrd Hamilton的Ricci流綱領的發展令人激動。本論文集詣在一冊書中為更廣的讀者提供Hamilton和其它人關
於Ricci流的工作。”
丘成桐哪裡有否認Perelman的貢獻？記住，此書出版於2003年6月1日。丘成桐那時就為Perelman的工作感到激動了。
做科學的人，應該明白的是，寫出來的paper是賴不掉的。丁院士，再賴也不能賴掉Hamilton和以丘成桐為首的中國科學家的貢獻吧。除非人家
Perelman文章中引用的是Morgan-Tian的工作。
可惜啊可惜，28篇中起碼還有一篇John Lott的文章。Morgan-Tian在哪裡喝西北風呢？
Morgan-Tian後來居然跑出來正兒八經地驗證Perelman的工作，沾Poincare和幾何化猜想證明的光，本身就是莫名其妙的荒唐事。