Nasar已經不敢見人了，美國國家公共電台多次要求採訪被拒。他們說的：“(在記者會)丘補充說‘中國人作出30%的貢獻不容易’”，拿新華社文稿對比一下就知道是“楊”冠丘戴。

佩賴子撒的謊就更多了。他說曹朱只是“沒看懂，重做一遍，沒有新的貢獻”，但誰都知道曹朱給出了“瑟猜完整證明的一個成文的描述”，而他自己只是“宣布了一個解法並保證在第四篇論文給出進一步詳細證明”(見Milnor在Notices的文章)，他的“保證”一直沒兌現。下面是從哥大網抄出來揭露佩賴子自打耳光的帖子：
According to Nasar-Gruber, “Perelman repeatedly said that he had retired from the mathematics community and no longer considered himself a professional mathematician.” Yet when asked about Cao-Zhu’ paper, which had just been published, Perelman knew the paper well, and did not see “what new contribution did they make”. That is good news. It shows that Perelman still goes to library and read the current issues of mathematical journals. Moreover, Perelman also knew that it was “Zhu did not quite understand the argument and reworked it.” Without reading the paper, Perelman would not have known that his proof was reworked. Without involving in the mathematics community, he would not have known that, in the Cao-Zhu paper, it was Zhu, not Chao, who has reworked his proof.

該文作者還說：如果漢密爾頓在2000年宣布non-colapsing，那麼佩也就是在“填細節”，可惜漢密爾頓比較誠實，知道自己沒本事“填細節”，從而沒有宣布。