Dear Dr. secCNY:

Thank you very much for your concern. Unfortunately, like many others, you are about 12 years out-dated in general relativity. Thus, your reaction is normal. This is also why so many erroneous theories on the matter of gravitational waves are still around. In addition, these authors, unlike you, did not read anything beyond what they believed. Consequently, they get into troubles deeper and deeper by referring to similar but erroneous views.

To answer your questions, I include the references of three papers for you to read. They were served as references in my papers, but you did not read them. Any comments and suggestions you may have will be appreciated. Thank you.I appreciate your advice.

I understand that Professor Yang, being one of the number one physicists, is a busy man and has many important things to take care. In fact, I have not contacted him since 1997 because things did not really concern him that much to call his attention. However, now it is urgently needed. The reasons to post the letter in the internet are: 1) it can be sure that Professor Yang would know it sometime, 2) Professor Yang have an option of answering it at a time of his convenience. 3) Nobody can accuse me of being unable to have face-to-face discussions.

I have the habit of communicating with other scientists on scientific matter in the xxxxat of open emails because this is a good way to avoid misunderstanding, misinterpretations, or getting into the trouble of arguments in terms of "you said versus I said". Another great advantage of such a xxxxat is that other scientists can participate as they wish. In addition, I have found cases that some people have thrown mud at me on my back.

However, since you believe that Professor Yang prefers other xxxxs of communications, I can change this xxxxat because Professor Yang is an honorable man. If you have further questions, please do not hesitate to ask. I hope that your assignments would do you lots of good. My best wishes!

Sincerely yours,

C. Y. Lo

p.s. My additional advice to you is to read and understand the papers of Zhou. The same advice for "Zhou's associates". One should understand that science is for the truth and only the truth. Thus, there is no privacy in the scientific matter.

References:

1. C. Y. Lo, Einstein's Radiation xxxxula and Modifications to the Einstein Equation, Astrophysical Journal 455, 421-428 (Dec. 20, 1995).
2. C. Y. Lo, On Incompatibility of Gravitational Radiation with the 1915 Einstein Equation, Phys. Essays 13 (4), 527-539 (December, 2000).
3. C. Y. Lo, The Gravitational “Plane Waves” of Liu and Zhou and the Nonexistence of Dynamic Solutions for Einstein’s Equation, Astrophys. Space Sci., 306: 205-215 (2006) (DOI 10.1007/s10509-006-9221-x).