設萬維讀者為首頁 廣告服務 聯繫我們 關於萬維
簡體 繁體 手機版
分類廣告
版主:諍友
萬維讀者網 > 教育學術 > 帖子
You should read the PRL that criticized C. N. Yang
送交者: c_y_lo 2007年08月14日00:00:00 於 [教育學術] 發送悄悄話

If you want to use the Physical Review as the standard, this does not help Professor Yang. You should read the Physical Review Letter [1] that criticized Professor C. N. Yang. In that letter, his 1974 paper [2] is identified as essentially a reproduction of a paper published in 1962. Moreover, it has many known defects. Do you still believe in the Physical Review?

I have concluded that the Physical Review have not published any good papers on gravity for a long time because the editorial did not understand Einstein's equivalence principle.

1. C. N. Yang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 33, 445 (1974).
2. R. Pavelle, Phys. Rev. Lett. 33, 1461 (Dec. 1974).

0%(0)
標 題 (必選項):
內 容 (選填項):
實用資訊
回國機票$360起 | 商務艙省$200 | 全球最佳航空公司出爐:海航獲五星
海外華人福利!在線看陳建斌《三叉戟》熱血歸回 豪情築夢 高清免費看 無地區限制