| zt反偽鬥士勾結美國演員誹謗中醫的鐵證。 |
| 送交者: 操菊花 2007年07月15日00:00:00 於 [教育學術] 發送悄悄話 |
|
反偽鬥士勾結美國演員誹謗中醫的鐵證。 有網友來信說,“反偽鬥士”們不承認他們勾結海外仇視中國文化的“科技警察”組織、彼此合作搞造謠誹謗中醫的事情。哈哈!咱早就有幾個帖文用事實證據說明了他們的勾結,下面拿其中之一請看看。說明幾點: 那個美國演員蘭迪是“科技警察”組織的主要成員。“科技警察”組織的宗旨和活動目標之一,就是通過造謠誹謗詆毀和剷除中醫科學、把中國傳統文化剷除掉。他們在美國的活動遭到慘敗,就跟科協科普所和政工宣傳們合作、把矛頭指向中國。而中國政府制定了發展中醫的規劃,堅定不移地發展中醫藥事業,使他們在中國搞破壞的陰謀也破產了。 科協科普所和政工宣傳們把他請到中國,曾受到美國媒體的譏諷,美國駐華使館得知後,明確說明,他們的活動是“厚顏無恥的假冒”。美國國家科學基金會也明確聲明,他們從來沒有支持過“科技警察”的所謂“反偽科學”定義及活動。這些就毫不留情地戳穿了他們借美國政府機構之名搞所謂“反偽科學”和反中醫的謠言謊言。 好了,下面是老帖之一,說明了反偽鬥士勾結美國演員誹謗中醫的鐵證。他們不承認,哈哈!可他們的美國師傅蘭迪卻把勾結情況交代得清清楚楚。您看看吧:
咱說了,司馬南等人夥同美國演員蘭迪污衊和企圖摧毀中醫氣功。他的所謂“反偽鬥士”頭銜,就是與中國傳統文化為敵的“反偽”,他的所謂“反偽”就是在夥同美國演員蘭迪合夥作假污衊中醫。不信嗎?看看證據。 (一)見後附件一。那是蘭迪先生自己寫的。他說:他應那些“反偽鬥士”的邀請訪問中國,在中國科學大會堂聯合擺了個擂台,向中國全體中醫氣功的人挑戰,說是誰有超人本事,就去打擂,證明了,就拿走司馬南提出的賭金1000萬元人民幣。蘭迪還說,他跟司馬南發表了聯合聲明,哪位中醫氣功人士證明自己有超人本事,就拿走1000萬美元;或者拿走司馬南提出的賭金1000萬元人民幣、由蘭迪先生的基金會作資金後盾。 請問:中國科學大會堂是中國中央一級召開學術會議的地方。司馬南並非科技學術人員、而是個開了私人公司的娛樂表演者,憑什麼能邀請美國演員聯合起來到開全國學術會議的地方搞娛樂賭博?把娛樂賭博當做科學學術活動,那本身不就是偽科學嗎?嘿嘿,“反偽鬥士”自己就是做偽和搞偽科學的。 經查詢,蘭迪先生的基金根本沒有1000萬美元。他給的賭金數額,是欺騙。如此,司馬南提出的賭金1000萬元人民幣,從何而來?如果不是說假話,能否說出資金來源?如果說是從自己業務收入來,那麼,稅務報告是否說明了自己確實收入、而沒有欺騙政府和沒有逃稅呢? (二)再看附件二。也是蘭迪先生自己的文字。他說:他給一位中醫寄了10張照片,讓中醫大夫用氣功方法判斷照片上的那些人是死的還是活的。中醫大夫的女兒回覆說:“中醫氣功是保健的,不是占卜或妖術。因此,我的父親不能告訴你那些照片上的人是死的還是活的。”於是,蘭迪先生責問道:你能診斷病症,就應該能診斷死亡,怎麼連這麼簡單的事都做不了?然後,他就在其它地方用這個例子污衊說中醫氣功是欺騙。 請問:西醫是僅僅看看照片就判斷人的死活嗎?哪個國家、哪所醫院、哪個醫生是那樣做的?用照片讓醫生診斷死活,做不了就說是欺騙,那做法本身就是個做偽,是搞偽命題、搞偽科學。 這麼一個無知、搞誣賴和搞偽科學的美國演員,居然被政工宣傳們和“反偽鬥士”們吹捧為“世界反偽科學著名專家”“國際科學界知名人士”等等,還邀請他到中國,在中國開全國學術會議的科學大會堂擺賭博擂台!如此烏煙瘴氣,腐敗之極。難怪當時美國主要報刊譏諷地說:中國要知道辨別科學上的真偽,不是搞科學實驗和做學術討論,而是需要美國娛樂演員的表演幫忙。 俗話說,人以群分。司馬南等“反偽鬥士”們夥同美國演員蘭迪聯手作假污衊中醫,說明“反偽鬥士”活動本身就是作偽的,其中有些活動甚至是說假話和違法亂紀(至少,他們的活動資金就不清不白)。更值得一提的是,司馬南等人並非是科學界人士,也不是搞科研的,而是搞政工宣傳的,居然能“調動”科協去對搞娛樂的吉氏記錄表態。中國的科學學術環境氣氛,已經讓那些裡應外合的烏煙瘴氣的以“反偽”名義作偽的活動破壞糟蹋成什麼樣子了、已經有多麼腐敗了!該整治一下了吧。##
I went to China by invitation, mainly to attend a huge press conference held by a cultural group there. It was also my first opportunity to meet Sima Nan, a 43-year-old journalist who is sponsored by a major Chinese pharmaceutical company and endorsed by the government, and who is well-known there for having adopted the JREF million-dollar challenge offer to all Chinese qi gong masters and/or psychics. His offer is for 10,000,000 yuan, the equivalent of about 1.2 million US dollars. Sima Nan and I issued a joint statement agreeing that anyone who wins the JREF million- dollar prize, will automatically win his $10,000,000 prize, as well, a prize which is backed by the pharmaceutical firm that sponsors him. And, should anyone win Sima Nan's prize, we at JREF agree that it will serve as the accomplishment of the required preliminary test for our prize.
I sent him ten photos of persons I know, simply asking him to tell me whether each person shown was dead or alive, rather than having to go through xxxxuating the long, convoluted, vague, dexxxxions such as, "Feels tired and weak at night, liver unbalance and bile excess, tingling in ears" that are part of the usual diagnosis. The simplified test has never been accepted by any of these "diagnosticians," who usually just stop corresponding at that point. But this man offered reasons for not doing such a basic test. Headed, "Qigong is not a divination or necromancy," the reply came, written by his daughter: Dear Mr. Randi, Firstly, Qigong is not the panacea, it can solve some problems, but not all of the human diseases, it is a very ancient physical theory in China, it is based on the Chinese Medicine, according to the flow of blood, venation structure. In the science age, Qigong could not heal all the disease. Qigong, means someone have more energy than the ordinary person, but not really a superman, in a short word, he owns talent or perxxxxance in a special condition. As to the photos, my father could not tell you who is alive or dead, sorry for that. One reason is his or her soul is still existent, but my father could give the diagnosis for him or her. I must to say, it will allow a little discrepancy. Qigong is not a divination or necromancy, it is inductive for magnetic field between the acceptor and dispenser, if you read some Chinese Wushu [Chinese martial arts] novels before, you could understand more easily. I responded: |
|
![]() |
![]() |
| 實用資訊 | |
|
|
| 一周點擊熱帖 | 更多>> |
| 一周回復熱帖 |
| 歷史上的今天:回復熱帖 |
| 2006: | 香港大學的面試題:見了胡錦濤,你會講 | |
| 2005: | 我對清華大學英語夏令營的看法 | |
| 2005: | 是專制敗壞了社會創造力 | |
| 2004: | 對伏明霞獲清華學位的質疑 | |
| 2004: | 從Berkeley去清華做博後的美國人 | |
| 2003: | “洋野雞大學”:國內臭,國外吃香 | |
| 2003: | 我眼中的哈佛大學 | |
| 2002: | 農村:“讀書無用論”回潮令人堪憂 | |
| 2002: | 平民教育與精英教育--紀念晏陽初先生 | |




