Nasar已经不敢见人了，美国国家公共电台多次要求采访被拒。他们说的：“(在记者会)丘补充说‘中国人作出30%的贡献不容易’”，拿新华社文稿对比一下就知道是“杨”冠丘戴。

佩赖子撒的谎就更多了。他说曹朱只是“没看懂，重做一遍，没有新的贡献”，但谁都知道曹朱给出了“瑟猜完整证明的一个成文的描述”，而他自己只是“宣布了一个解法并保证在第四篇论文给出进一步详细证明”(见Milnor在Notices的文章)，他的“保证”一直没兑现。下面是从哥大网抄出来揭露佩赖子自打耳光的帖子：
According to Nasar-Gruber, “Perelman repeatedly said that he had retired from the mathematics community and no longer considered himself a professional mathematician.” Yet when asked about Cao-Zhu’ paper, which had just been published, Perelman knew the paper well, and did not see “what new contribution did they make”. That is good news. It shows that Perelman still goes to library and read the current issues of mathematical journals. Moreover, Perelman also knew that it was “Zhu did not quite understand the argument and reworked it.” Without reading the paper, Perelman would not have known that his proof was reworked. Without involving in the mathematics community, he would not have known that, in the Cao-Zhu paper, it was Zhu, not Chao, who has reworked his proof.

该文作者还说：如果汉密尔顿在2000年宣布non-colapsing，那么佩也就是在“填细节”，可惜汉密尔顿比较诚实，知道自己没本事“填细节”，从而没有宣布。