| zt反伪斗士勾结美国演员诽谤中医的铁证。 |
| 送交者: 操菊花 2007年07月15日00:00:00 于 [教育学术] 发送悄悄话 |
|
反伪斗士勾结美国演员诽谤中医的铁证。 有网友来信说,“反伪斗士”们不承认他们勾结海外仇视中国文化的“科技警察”组织、彼此合作搞造谣诽谤中医的事情。哈哈!咱早就有几个帖文用事实证据说明了他们的勾结,下面拿其中之一请看看。说明几点: 那个美国演员兰迪是“科技警察”组织的主要成员。“科技警察”组织的宗旨和活动目标之一,就是通过造谣诽谤诋毁和铲除中医科学、把中国传统文化铲除掉。他们在美国的活动遭到惨败,就跟科协科普所和政工宣传们合作、把矛头指向中国。而中国政府制定了发展中医的规划,坚定不移地发展中医药事业,使他们在中国搞破坏的阴谋也破产了。 科协科普所和政工宣传们把他请到中国,曾受到美国媒体的讥讽,美国驻华使馆得知后,明确说明,他们的活动是“厚颜无耻的假冒”。美国国家科学基金会也明确声明,他们从来没有支持过“科技警察”的所谓“反伪科学”定义及活动。这些就毫不留情地戳穿了他们借美国政府机构之名搞所谓“反伪科学”和反中医的谣言谎言。 好了,下面是老帖之一,说明了反伪斗士勾结美国演员诽谤中医的铁证。他们不承认,哈哈!可他们的美国师傅兰迪却把勾结情况交代得清清楚楚。您看看吧:
咱说了,司马南等人伙同美国演员兰迪污蔑和企图摧毁中医气功。他的所谓“反伪斗士”头衔,就是与中国传统文化为敌的“反伪”,他的所谓“反伪”就是在伙同美国演员兰迪合伙作假污蔑中医。不信吗?看看证据。 (一)见后附件一。那是兰迪先生自己写的。他说:他应那些“反伪斗士”的邀请访问中国,在中国科学大会堂联合摆了个擂台,向中国全体中医气功的人挑战,说是谁有超人本事,就去打擂,证明了,就拿走司马南提出的赌金1000万元人民币。兰迪还说,他跟司马南发表了联合声明,哪位中医气功人士证明自己有超人本事,就拿走1000万美元;或者拿走司马南提出的赌金1000万元人民币、由兰迪先生的基金会作资金后盾。 请问:中国科学大会堂是中国中央一级召开学术会议的地方。司马南并非科技学术人员、而是个开了私人公司的娱乐表演者,凭什么能邀请美国演员联合起来到开全国学术会议的地方搞娱乐赌博?把娱乐赌博当做科学学术活动,那本身不就是伪科学吗?嘿嘿,“反伪斗士”自己就是做伪和搞伪科学的。 经查询,兰迪先生的基金根本没有1000万美元。他给的赌金数额,是欺骗。如此,司马南提出的赌金1000万元人民币,从何而来?如果不是说假话,能否说出资金来源?如果说是从自己业务收入来,那么,税务报告是否说明了自己确实收入、而没有欺骗政府和没有逃税呢? (二)再看附件二。也是兰迪先生自己的文字。他说:他给一位中医寄了10张照片,让中医大夫用气功方法判断照片上的那些人是死的还是活的。中医大夫的女儿回复说:“中医气功是保健的,不是占卜或妖术。因此,我的父亲不能告诉你那些照片上的人是死的还是活的。”于是,兰迪先生责问道:你能诊断病症,就应该能诊断死亡,怎么连这么简单的事都做不了?然后,他就在其它地方用这个例子污蔑说中医气功是欺骗。 请问:西医是仅仅看看照片就判断人的死活吗?哪个国家、哪所医院、哪个医生是那样做的?用照片让医生诊断死活,做不了就说是欺骗,那做法本身就是个做伪,是搞伪命题、搞伪科学。 这么一个无知、搞诬赖和搞伪科学的美国演员,居然被政工宣传们和“反伪斗士”们吹捧为“世界反伪科学著名专家”“国际科学界知名人士”等等,还邀请他到中国,在中国开全国学术会议的科学大会堂摆赌博擂台!如此乌烟瘴气,腐败之极。难怪当时美国主要报刊讥讽地说:中国要知道辨别科学上的真伪,不是搞科学实验和做学术讨论,而是需要美国娱乐演员的表演帮忙。 俗话说,人以群分。司马南等“反伪斗士”们伙同美国演员兰迪联手作假污蔑中医,说明“反伪斗士”活动本身就是作伪的,其中有些活动甚至是说假话和违法乱纪(至少,他们的活动资金就不清不白)。更值得一提的是,司马南等人并非是科学界人士,也不是搞科研的,而是搞政工宣传的,居然能“调动”科协去对搞娱乐的吉氏记录表态。中国的科学学术环境气氛,已经让那些里应外合的乌烟瘴气的以“反伪”名义作伪的活动破坏糟蹋成什么样子了、已经有多么腐败了!该整治一下了吧。##
I went to China by invitation, mainly to attend a huge press conference held by a cultural group there. It was also my first opportunity to meet Sima Nan, a 43-year-old journalist who is sponsored by a major Chinese pharmaceutical company and endorsed by the government, and who is well-known there for having adopted the JREF million-dollar challenge offer to all Chinese qi gong masters and/or psychics. His offer is for 10,000,000 yuan, the equivalent of about 1.2 million US dollars. Sima Nan and I issued a joint statement agreeing that anyone who wins the JREF million- dollar prize, will automatically win his $10,000,000 prize, as well, a prize which is backed by the pharmaceutical firm that sponsors him. And, should anyone win Sima Nan's prize, we at JREF agree that it will serve as the accomplishment of the required preliminary test for our prize.
I sent him ten photos of persons I know, simply asking him to tell me whether each person shown was dead or alive, rather than having to go through xxxxuating the long, convoluted, vague, dexxxxions such as, "Feels tired and weak at night, liver unbalance and bile excess, tingling in ears" that are part of the usual diagnosis. The simplified test has never been accepted by any of these "diagnosticians," who usually just stop corresponding at that point. But this man offered reasons for not doing such a basic test. Headed, "Qigong is not a divination or necromancy," the reply came, written by his daughter: Dear Mr. Randi, Firstly, Qigong is not the panacea, it can solve some problems, but not all of the human diseases, it is a very ancient physical theory in China, it is based on the Chinese Medicine, according to the flow of blood, venation structure. In the science age, Qigong could not heal all the disease. Qigong, means someone have more energy than the ordinary person, but not really a superman, in a short word, he owns talent or perxxxxance in a special condition. As to the photos, my father could not tell you who is alive or dead, sorry for that. One reason is his or her soul is still existent, but my father could give the diagnosis for him or her. I must to say, it will allow a little discrepancy. Qigong is not a divination or necromancy, it is inductive for magnetic field between the acceptor and dispenser, if you read some Chinese Wushu [Chinese martial arts] novels before, you could understand more easily. I responded: |
|
![]() |
![]() |
| 实用资讯 | |
|
|
| 一周点击热帖 | 更多>> |
| 一周回复热帖 |
| 历史上的今天:回复热帖 |
| 2006: | 香港大学的面试题:见了胡锦涛,你会讲 | |
| 2005: | 我对清华大学英语夏令营的看法 | |
| 2005: | 是专制败坏了社会创造力 | |
| 2004: | 对伏明霞获清华学位的质疑 | |
| 2004: | 从Berkeley去清华做博后的美国人 | |
| 2003: | “洋野鸡大学”:国内臭,国外吃香 | |
| 2003: | 我眼中的哈佛大学 | |
| 2002: | 农村:“读书无用论”回潮令人堪忧 | |
| 2002: | 平民教育与精英教育--纪念晏阳初先生 | |




