丘成桐在Poincare猜想证明中的贡献是丁院士赖得掉的吗？

丁院士还是中国几何分析创新群体小组的带头人，请问丁院士难道不知道丘是现代几何分析方法的创始人？
人家Perelman在2002年的第一篇arXiv文章引用的28篇文章中，Hamilton有10篇，丘成桐1篇，丘的学生曹怀东和周培能4篇。
曹怀东、周培能、S.C.Chu（周的学生）、丘成桐在2003年6月1日共同编辑的《Collected Papers on Ricci Flow》一书的出版描述中写到：
“The Ricci flow is currently a hot topic at the forefront of mathematics research. Ricci flow as an approach to the Geometrization Conjecture has recently received attention in the press with articles appearing in The New York Times and other popular newspapers and magazines. The NY Times article refers to recent work of Grisha Perelman on Richard Hamilton's program for Ricci flow as an approach to Thurston's Geometrization Conjecture.

In the past two decades the Ricci flow, and particularly Richard Hamilton's work, has received attention as both having a profound influence on geometric evolution equations and as a possible approach to studying Thurston's Geometrization Conjecture. This selection of papers on the Riemannian Ricci flow is intended for a variety of purposes. The graduate student or researcher unfamiliar with the Ricci flow may use it as an introduction to the Ricci flow quickly leading to current research topics and open problems. Geometers already familiar with the Ricci flow may use it as a handy reference which contains almost all of Richard Hamilton's papers on the subject to date (2002).
The recent developments of Grisha Perelman on Richard Hamilton's program for Ricci flow are exciting. And our collection is intended to make readily available, in one book, the work of Hamilton and others on Ricci flow to a wider audience. ”

丁院士和田刚院士不可能不知道这本Ricci Liu的基本读物吧？
这最后一句话说：
“最近Grisha Perelman关于Richanrd Hamilton的Ricci流纲领的发展令人激动。本论文集诣在一册书中为更广的读者提供Hamilton和其它人关
于Ricci流的工作。”
丘成桐哪里有否认Perelman的贡献？记住，此书出版于2003年6月1日。丘成桐那时就为Perelman的工作感到激动了。
做科学的人，应该明白的是，写出来的paper是赖不掉的。丁院士，再赖也不能赖掉Hamilton和以丘成桐为首的中国科学家的贡献吧。除非人家
Perelman文章中引用的是Morgan-Tian的工作。
可惜啊可惜，28篇中起码还有一篇John Lott的文章。Morgan-Tian在哪里喝西北风呢？
Morgan-Tian后来居然跑出来正儿八经地验证Perelman的工作，沾Poincare和几何化猜想证明的光，本身就是莫名其妙的荒唐事。