我相信预定论是改革宗的根基，然而抱着它作为偶像也是荒唐。

持守和为“根基”竭力争辩就叫做“偶像”？？？？？？这才是最荒唐的思维了

Both Arminians and hyper-Calvinists err at this point.

我相信John Frame也是反对 hyper-Calvinists，这篇大作没有展开，但在其他地方有阐述。

宝贝，问题是什么叫“极加”，你“感觉不对你的胃口”就叫做“极加”？？？持守和为“根基”竭力争辩就叫做“偶像”？？？？？？这才是最荒唐的思维了

同时文中也提到了这样一个观点：

Confessions are not Scripture, and they should not be treated as infallible or as ultimately normative. Indeed, I believe it is important that in a church fellowship it be possible to revise the creeds, and for that purpose, it must also be possible for members and officers to dissent from the creed within some limits. Otherwise, the creed will, practically speaking, be elevated to a position of authority equivalent to Scripture. 

这个我跟你反反复复都说过，我们从来不将之视为“高过”圣经的东西，但我们将之视为“出自”圣经的，所以我们持守之，并为之竭力争辩。

事实上，Frame在文中提到：

 In the case of the Reformed faith, the doctrinal system is far more than five points; it is a comprehensive understanding of Scripture, and thus a comprehensive world-and-life view.

这是一个基本常识，我早就反反复复跟你说过了，你却反反复复将我没说过的东西塞进我的嘴里，你根本就不是一个诚实的人。我一再强调郁金香是耶稣基督这位“绊脚的石头”，你等就在这绊脚石上跌倒了。

还有：

Calvinism has been a very “progressive” kind of theology. Reformed theology, typically, has not simply reiterated the statements of Calvin and the confessions. It has gone on to develop new applications of Scripture and Reformed doctrine. In the seventeenth century, there was a significant development in Reformed thinking about God’s covenants. In the eighteenth century thinker Jonathan Edwards, there is new teaching on the subjective dimensions of the Christian life. In the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, there was the remarkable development, under Vos and others, of “biblical theology,” the analysis of Scripture as a history of redemption. In the twentieth century there was Van Til’s apologetics and Meredith Kline’s Structure of Biblical Authority.

这是一个基本常识，我早就反反复复跟你说过了，你却反反复复将我没说过的东西塞进我的嘴里，你根本就不是一个诚实的人。

结论讲的好：

You can see that the Reformed Faith is exceedingly rich!

 None of us can maintain a perfect balance of emphasis. And different situations require of us different emphases, as we “contextualize” our theology to bring God’s word to bear on the situations we are in.

这是一个基本常识，我早就反反复复跟你说过了，你却反反复复将我没说过的东西塞进我的嘴里，你根本就不是一个诚实的人。