中國不僅正在成長為世界物質產品的工廠,還開始造就改變人生的精神產品,後者的意義更加深遠


(《上帝歸來》的書名在很大程度上是針對近百年來世界流行的類似上帝已死的觀點,比如1966年4月8號《時代周刊》這個封面提出的問題,還有《經濟學家》自己在1999年千年版中關於上帝的訃告)
“眾所周知,美國是由公司和教會建立的。” 大約一年前,約翰·米克爾斯維特(John Micklethwait)在《華爾街日報》上寫道。 這句話也許有些莫名其妙。
近一年來,這位《經濟學家》(The Economist 或譯為《經濟學人》)主編為推廣他的新書在各種媒體上向公眾介紹他的新發現。這個新發現,就是書名所顯示的,《上帝歸來:全球信仰的復興在怎樣改變世界》(God Is Back: How the Global Revival of Faith Is Changing the World)。
作為一份時事和商業雜誌的領導者,花費幾年的時間寫出這樣一本報告世界信仰狀況的書,看起來也許讓人感到不解。但留心世界變化的人們,可能會對這樣的報告期待已久了。
在互聯網時代,167歲的《經濟學家》之所以有如此的生命力,主要在於它很能幫助人們從每周紛繁瑣碎的信息中辨識出世界的方向以及如何解決問題,這樣的幫助顯然不是任何媒體都能提供的,儘管它也不可能做到十足的全面和細緻。
由這本雜誌當前最重要的編輯撰寫的作品,便很難讓人完全忽視。也許只需簡要看看他的寫作軌跡,就能有助於理解這本書為什麼值得重視。
1962年生於倫敦的米克爾斯維特,早年就讀英國最大的天主教會寄宿學校——安波爾福斯(Ampleforth),被認為是英國天主教的伊頓公學,然後進入牛津大學抹大拉學院——以耶穌的門徒抹大拉的馬利亞命名,那裡的校友包括英譯《聖經》的丁道爾、寫《羅馬興衰史》的吉本、前北約司令克拉克還有推動自己國家民主化的不丹現任國王旺楚克。
米克爾斯維特在大學主修的是歷史,25歲加入《經濟學家》之前曾經在大通曼哈頓銀行工作兩年,他跟同事艾德里安·伍德里奇(Adrian Wooldridge)——著名的前任萊剋星頓專欄作者——合寫過五本書:《巫醫:理解管理大師》(1996年)、《將來完成時:全球化的挑戰和背後的應許》(2000)、《公司:一個劃時代觀念之簡史》(2003)、《右派國家:美國的保守力量》(2004)以及如今的《上帝歸來:全球信仰的復興在怎樣改變世界》。
在當今關注世界局勢的時髦著作中,這兩位作者——也是《經濟學家》——的與眾不同之處,是既不那麼大而化之地縱論全球大事也不僅僅停留於講故事,而是能抓住重點,旗幟鮮明的推廣他們經過慎重判斷而認為有益世界健康生長的因素。
他們集中於兩個他們認為已經在全球很多地方推廣的可持續發展模型:公司和教會。在他們看來,這不僅是使得美國生長出長久活力的兩個基本組織,也是真正推動幸福的自由生活在全球擴展的兩個基本組織。在這一點上,他們與托克維爾、白哲特、德魯克這樣的社會考察者一脈相承。
在世界輿論中,關注公司的人並不少見,關注教會的人其實也不算太少,然而同時關注這兩個組織的卻的確不多見。問題是,同時關注這兩個組織又怎樣呢?
這兩位作者認為,能夠依照一視同仁的恆定規則而自由的創辦這兩個組織,才為人們享有豐富的物質和精神產品提供了可能,而物質和精神的需求是人們過上幸福生活的必需。
在他們看來,物質與精神不是分裂的,只有供應兩者需求的市場都按照自由選擇和恆定規則的支配,人的生活才可能是完整的,人的需求才可能獲得最好的滿足。
商業組織和信仰組織共同在全球的拓展是出人意料的事情。本來僅僅限於美國和少部分歐洲的現象,在最近的30年竟然蔓延到原來被認為很不可能的地方。
新興中國的截面
這其中最顯著的例子莫過於中國。近幾年來,已經有不少的報道和專著記載這方面的驚人變化。但是,正如前面說的,寫商業的和寫信仰的大多互不相干,而即使涉及兩者的,也可能由於受到時代偏見的左右或眼界的狹隘不能準確揭示其中的本質。
在中國的例子中,原本被普遍認為水土不服的公司和教會,經歷30年漸進累積的生長,已經成為越來越多人生活的重要部分。其中一個不容忽視的現象是,公司和教會在中國的紮根在很大程度上不是海外傳入的直接結果,而是自生自發的,雖然開放的環境起到了必要的作用。
如果公司的發展是由於國家對致富的鼓勵和私人財產權的逐步落實,教會在中國城市的興起更加出人意外。然而,對於米克爾斯維特,這個現象卻是最代表“新興中國”的典型截面。
在他考察過的地方,教會並不像傳統中高大教堂給人的印象,而是出現在無數家庭的客廳里。每周,在那裡,家人和朋友們一起學習他們所信仰的上帝的話語,分享交流一周來的所得、所失。
而其中的一些,家裡已經裝不下越來越多的參加者,他們開始出租寫字樓,就像家庭作坊長成大公司。(對此,近來引人注目的報道是2010年3月17日《中國日報》China Daily 的文章。)
在那裡,除了每周日的敬拜聚會,還有針對不同群體的團契和學校,也可能有圖書館、雜誌、網站,以及針對不同人生話題的講座和郊遊,這自然少不了常常困擾人的婚姻、家庭和工作問題。
創辦這些組織的人,就像本系列中提到的華理克,被稱為精神企業家。但是由於他們生長的環境並不像華理克那樣繼承祖業,大多是在這個領域中創業的第一代,更具有創業家的色彩。他們中不乏清華北大這些大學畢業的,有的從學校出來就開始創辦教會,有工作背景的則跨越了社會各個領域,企業、政府、教育、媒體都有。
從創業的環境,他們面臨的挑戰也可能遠大於在美國的同行。跟全球的普遍狀況沒有多大差別,世俗化的現象無所不在。更困難的是,不僅沒有國家的扶持,而且還有歷史和意識形態的因素帶來的阻力。
然而,正是在這樣看起來不利的環境下,這個群體卻在中國前所未有的增長,即使在整個人類歷史上,變化之大都是少見的。《上帝歸來》的兩位作者估計,中國在不久的將來將成為全球基督徒人數最多的國家。
按照米克爾斯維特和伍德里奇——他們分別是天主教派的基督徒和無神論者——的分析,這樣處在逐步開放中的環境,恰恰催促了精神產品市場的擴展。
正是因為歷史和意識形態的糾纏、沒有國家的扶持以及社會的世俗化,生產和提供精神產品的創業者們必須真正具有競爭力才能存活下去,而一旦經得起各種壓力的考驗,仍然能夠吸引和造就不斷增長的消費群體和主動參與的新生力量,這樣似乎有悖常理的巨大變化就是情理之中的事情了。
在華里克創辦馬鞍峰教會的歷程中,有一個現象表明了這個組織成長的活力。在最初的15年,也就是在馬鞍峰迄今一半的歷史上,這個組織一直都沒有屬於自己的總部,它都是通過租房聚會的。15年間,換了79個地方。
“我們用過四個高中,無數的小學,銀行建築,休閒中心,劇院,社區中心,餐廳,大房子,寫字樓,體育館,直到最後我們立起一個2300個座位的高科技帳篷……我覺得大部分的教會建築,建得太早也太小。鞋子不該告訴腳該長多大。”華里克在他那本1995年出版的《目標導向的教會:生長,卻不讓你的信息和使命妥協》中總結道。
類似的經歷也發生在中國的信仰組織中,有些組織在發展了十幾年後才開始正式考慮建立恆定的場所。
總體來說,這樣的信仰組織在中國的意外成長,至少展現了兩個不容忽視的趨向。一是,在經歷相當長期的封閉和停滯之後,中國的社會空間終於開始呈現出超越人為設計的富於自發生長和擴展的景象,二是,在這樣不斷突破原有瓶頸的生長空間中,人在自發地尋求自由而負責任的秩序和歸宿。
就像米克爾斯維特和伍德里奇指出的,這個動力是恆久存在的,“自古以來,人類就一直有着揮之不去的對精神意義的追尋”,而一旦社會有了自由選擇和競爭,這個動力就可能生發出巨大的創造力。
問題是,人能夠找到自由而負責任的秩序和歸宿嗎?如果事實上不存在,任憑人如何尋求,也恐怕是徒勞。
精神企業家們和被他們影響之人的很多故事,表明事實上存在這種改變人心的力量,本系列介紹的諸如奧巴馬、德魯克等人的轉變只是其中著名的事例而已,這樣的故事也正在中國的土地上開始展現。這些組織正在成為幫助各行各業的人獲得靈魂重生的孵化器。
然而,中國仍不過是世界的一部分,其他地區怎樣呢?接下來有機會一步步分享。
From The Washington Post
From The Washington Post's Book World/washingtonpost.com Reviewed by Diana Butler Bass Conventional analysis of contemporary faith divides the world into two camps of political engagement: liberal secularists, who reject any role for religion in public life, and conservative believers, who strive for a Christian or Muslim state. As a result, discussions on religion and politics degenerate into arguments over excising religion from or adding more religion to public life. Readers who subscribe to this dualistic view will be surprised by "God Is Back." At first glance, the title gives the impression that John Micklethwait and Adrian Wooldridge are arguing for an international faith-based political agenda. But this is a cool-headed book, more analytical than partisan, marked by crisp prose and well-formed insights into politics and policy. Although the authors are sympathetic to religion, they recognize its limits and problems, especially the tensions between fundamentalist forms of Christianity and Islam. While explaining the worldwide renewal of faith, they also examine the flash points of religion and politics. In the end, they criticize both secularists and believers. They argue that the main fault lies not with religion but with the "union of religion and power," used coercively. They urge their readers to move beyond a good/bad view of religion toward a more thoughtful approach that considers the role of churches in strengthening economies, providing meaningful work and reducing poverty. A historical question frames the book: Is modernity hostile to religion? The authors give two answers. First, the French Revolution proposed that religion itself was problematic and that societies should embrace secularism. Second, America's founders envisioned that religious freedom and its resulting competition might foster a healthy interplay of faith and politics in public life. "God Is Back" argues that while Europe has followed the French model of secularism, the American model of religious tolerance seems to be prevailing in the world today. The book opens with an American evangelical-style Bible study in Shanghai, where the pastor proclaims: "In Europe the church is old. Here it is modern. Religion is a sign of higher ideals and progress. Spiritual wealth and material wealth go together. That is why we will win." These words echo the American view that economic prosperity meshes with religious freedom. This vignette supports the book's main point: that religion and modernity are not at odds, that, in the American mode, they can function together to create prosperity and individual freedom. Historians have been making similar arguments for several decades. But "God Is Back" moves beyond the standard analysis to argue that religion offers people a wide range of additional social rewards beyond economic ones, including comfort, community and meaning. Because modern life tends to cut people off from tradition, it creates a longing to reconnect that religion can satisfy. Thus, the more advanced a country becomes, the greater its people's need for faith to fill in the gaps left by cultural change. But the atheists keep asking, Isn't religion the primary source of conflict in the world today? Wouldn't a secular world be less violent? Can radically different religions get along in the modern world? The authors say yes, no and yes. They admit the conflicts but insist that the American model provides a hopeful template for religious pluralism and mutual tolerance. I have a few quibbles with their argument. In the historical sections, they depend too heavily on evangelical historians, thus giving their overview of American religion -- and Christianity in general -- an overwhelmingly Protestant cast. In addition, they accept the theory that people choose religion rationally on the basis of its social benefits; this is a hotly debated topic in religious studies. As journalists, however, Micklethwait and Wooldridge excel: Their eye for detail, ability to see the other side of the story, sense of nuance and irony are all highly developed. "God is Back" is an intelligent account of contemporary religion and the role it might play in making the modern world more open, tolerant and peaceful. In the end, the authors confess that their basic message "is a profoundly liberal one." Complete religious freedom -- including the freedom to reject religion -- is the best human path to the future. To that it can be hoped that people say: Amen.
Copyright 2009, The Washington Post. All Rights Reserved.
Book Description
Two Economist writers show how and why religion is booming around the world and reveal its vast effects on the global economy, politics, and moreOn the street and in the corridors of power, religion is surging worldwide. From Russia to Turkey to India, nations that swore off faith in the last century—or even tried to stamp it out—are now run by avowedly religious leaders. Formerly secular conflicts like the one in Palestine have taken on an overtly religious cast.
God Is Back shines a bright light on this hidden world of faith, from exorcisms in São Paulo to religious skirmishing in Nigeria, to televangelism in California and house churches in China.
Since the Enlightenment, intellectuals have assumed that modernization would kill religion—and that religious America is an oddity. As
God Is Back argues, religion and modernity can thrive together, and America is becoming the norm. Many things helped spark the global revival of religion, including the failure of communism and the rise of globalism. But, above all, twenty-first century religion is being fueled by a very American emphasis on competition and a customer- driven approach to salvation. These qualities have characterized this country’s faith ever since the Founders separated church and state, creating a religious free market defined by entrepreneurship, choice, and personal revelation. As market forces reshape the world, the tools and ideals of American evangelism are now spreading everywhere.
The global rise of faith will have a dramatic and far- reaching impact on our century. Indeed, its destabilizing effects can already be seen far from Iraq or the World Trade Center. Religion plays a role in civil wars from Sri Lanka to Sudan. Along the tenth parallel, from West Africa to the Philippines, religious fervor and political unrest are reinforcing each other.
God Is Back concludes by showing how the same American ideas that created our unique religious style can be applied around the globe to channel the rising tide of faith away from volatility and violence.