中国不仅正在成长为世界物质产品的工厂,还开始造就改变人生的精神产品,后者的意义更加深远


(《上帝归来》的书名在很大程度上是针对近百年来世界流行的类似上帝已死的观点,比如1966年4月8号《时代周刊》这个封面提出的问题,还有《经济学家》自己在1999年千年版中关于上帝的讣告)
“众所周知,美国是由公司和教会建立的。” 大约一年前,约翰·米克尔斯维特(John Micklethwait)在《华尔街日报》上写道。 这句话也许有些莫名其妙。
近一年来,这位《经济学家》(The Economist 或译为《经济学人》)主编为推广他的新书在各种媒体上向公众介绍他的新发现。这个新发现,就是书名所显示的,《上帝归来:全球信仰的复兴在怎样改变世界》(God Is Back: How the Global Revival of Faith Is Changing the World)。
作为一份时事和商业杂志的领导者,花费几年的时间写出这样一本报告世界信仰状况的书,看起来也许让人感到不解。但留心世界变化的人们,可能会对这样的报告期待已久了。
在互联网时代,167岁的《经济学家》之所以有如此的生命力,主要在于它很能帮助人们从每周纷繁琐碎的信息中辨识出世界的方向以及如何解决问题,这样的帮助显然不是任何媒体都能提供的,尽管它也不可能做到十足的全面和细致。
由这本杂志当前最重要的编辑撰写的作品,便很难让人完全忽视。也许只需简要看看他的写作轨迹,就能有助于理解这本书为什么值得重视。
1962年生于伦敦的米克尔斯维特,早年就读英国最大的天主教会寄宿学校——安波尔福斯(Ampleforth),被认为是英国天主教的伊顿公学,然后进入牛津大学抹大拉学院——以耶稣的门徒抹大拉的马利亚命名,那里的校友包括英译《圣经》的丁道尔、写《罗马兴衰史》的吉本、前北约司令克拉克还有推动自己国家民主化的不丹现任国王旺楚克。
米克尔斯维特在大学主修的是历史,25岁加入《经济学家》之前曾经在大通曼哈顿银行工作两年,他跟同事艾德里安·伍德里奇(Adrian Wooldridge)——著名的前任莱克星顿专栏作者——合写过五本书:《巫医:理解管理大师》(1996年)、《将来完成时:全球化的挑战和背后的应许》(2000)、《公司:一个划时代观念之简史》(2003)、《右派国家:美国的保守力量》(2004)以及如今的《上帝归来:全球信仰的复兴在怎样改变世界》。
在当今关注世界局势的时髦著作中,这两位作者——也是《经济学家》——的与众不同之处,是既不那么大而化之地纵论全球大事也不仅仅停留于讲故事,而是能抓住重点,旗帜鲜明的推广他们经过慎重判断而认为有益世界健康生长的因素。
他们集中于两个他们认为已经在全球很多地方推广的可持续发展模型:公司和教会。在他们看来,这不仅是使得美国生长出长久活力的两个基本组织,也是真正推动幸福的自由生活在全球扩展的两个基本组织。在这一点上,他们与托克维尔、白哲特、德鲁克这样的社会考察者一脉相承。
在世界舆论中,关注公司的人并不少见,关注教会的人其实也不算太少,然而同时关注这两个组织的却的确不多见。问题是,同时关注这两个组织又怎样呢?
这两位作者认为,能够依照一视同仁的恒定规则而自由的创办这两个组织,才为人们享有丰富的物质和精神产品提供了可能,而物质和精神的需求是人们过上幸福生活的必需。
在他们看来,物质与精神不是分裂的,只有供应两者需求的市场都按照自由选择和恒定规则的支配,人的生活才可能是完整的,人的需求才可能获得最好的满足。
商业组织和信仰组织共同在全球的拓展是出人意料的事情。本来仅仅限于美国和少部分欧洲的现象,在最近的30年竟然蔓延到原来被认为很不可能的地方。
新兴中国的截面
这其中最显著的例子莫过于中国。近几年来,已经有不少的报道和专著记载这方面的惊人变化。但是,正如前面说的,写商业的和写信仰的大多互不相干,而即使涉及两者的,也可能由于受到时代偏见的左右或眼界的狭隘不能准确揭示其中的本质。
在中国的例子中,原本被普遍认为水土不服的公司和教会,经历30年渐进累积的生长,已经成为越来越多人生活的重要部分。其中一个不容忽视的现象是,公司和教会在中国的扎根在很大程度上不是海外传入的直接结果,而是自生自发的,虽然开放的环境起到了必要的作用。
如果公司的发展是由于国家对致富的鼓励和私人财产权的逐步落实,教会在中国城市的兴起更加出人意外。然而,对于米克尔斯维特,这个现象却是最代表“新兴中国”的典型截面。
在他考察过的地方,教会并不像传统中高大教堂给人的印象,而是出现在无数家庭的客厅里。每周,在那里,家人和朋友们一起学习他们所信仰的上帝的话语,分享交流一周来的所得、所失。
而其中的一些,家里已经装不下越来越多的参加者,他们开始出租写字楼,就像家庭作坊长成大公司。(对此,近来引人注目的报道是2010年3月17日《中国日报》China Daily 的文章。)
在那里,除了每周日的敬拜聚会,还有针对不同群体的团契和学校,也可能有图书馆、杂志、网站,以及针对不同人生话题的讲座和郊游,这自然少不了常常困扰人的婚姻、家庭和工作问题。
创办这些组织的人,就像本系列中提到的华理克,被称为精神企业家。但是由于他们生长的环境并不像华理克那样继承祖业,大多是在这个领域中创业的第一代,更具有创业家的色彩。他们中不乏清华北大这些大学毕业的,有的从学校出来就开始创办教会,有工作背景的则跨越了社会各个领域,企业、政府、教育、媒体都有。
从创业的环境,他们面临的挑战也可能远大于在美国的同行。跟全球的普遍状况没有多大差别,世俗化的现象无所不在。更困难的是,不仅没有国家的扶持,而且还有历史和意识形态的因素带来的阻力。
然而,正是在这样看起来不利的环境下,这个群体却在中国前所未有的增长,即使在整个人类历史上,变化之大都是少见的。《上帝归来》的两位作者估计,中国在不久的将来将成为全球基督徒人数最多的国家。
按照米克尔斯维特和伍德里奇——他们分别是天主教派的基督徒和无神论者——的分析,这样处在逐步开放中的环境,恰恰催促了精神产品市场的扩展。
正是因为历史和意识形态的纠缠、没有国家的扶持以及社会的世俗化,生产和提供精神产品的创业者们必须真正具有竞争力才能存活下去,而一旦经得起各种压力的考验,仍然能够吸引和造就不断增长的消费群体和主动参与的新生力量,这样似乎有悖常理的巨大变化就是情理之中的事情了。
在华里克创办马鞍峰教会的历程中,有一个现象表明了这个组织成长的活力。在最初的15年,也就是在马鞍峰迄今一半的历史上,这个组织一直都没有属于自己的总部,它都是通过租房聚会的。15年间,换了79个地方。
“我们用过四个高中,无数的小学,银行建筑,休闲中心,剧院,社区中心,餐厅,大房子,写字楼,体育馆,直到最后我们立起一个2300个座位的高科技帐篷……我觉得大部分的教会建筑,建得太早也太小。鞋子不该告诉脚该长多大。”华里克在他那本1995年出版的《目标导向的教会:生长,却不让你的信息和使命妥协》中总结道。
类似的经历也发生在中国的信仰组织中,有些组织在发展了十几年后才开始正式考虑建立恒定的场所。
总体来说,这样的信仰组织在中国的意外成长,至少展现了两个不容忽视的趋向。一是,在经历相当长期的封闭和停滞之后,中国的社会空间终于开始呈现出超越人为设计的富于自发生长和扩展的景象,二是,在这样不断突破原有瓶颈的生长空间中,人在自发地寻求自由而负责任的秩序和归宿。
就像米克尔斯维特和伍德里奇指出的,这个动力是恒久存在的,“自古以来,人类就一直有着挥之不去的对精神意义的追寻”,而一旦社会有了自由选择和竞争,这个动力就可能生发出巨大的创造力。
问题是,人能够找到自由而负责任的秩序和归宿吗?如果事实上不存在,任凭人如何寻求,也恐怕是徒劳。
精神企业家们和被他们影响之人的很多故事,表明事实上存在这种改变人心的力量,本系列介绍的诸如奥巴马、德鲁克等人的转变只是其中著名的事例而已,这样的故事也正在中国的土地上开始展现。这些组织正在成为帮助各行各业的人获得灵魂重生的孵化器。
然而,中国仍不过是世界的一部分,其他地区怎样呢?接下来有机会一步步分享。
From The Washington Post
From The Washington Post's Book World/washingtonpost.com Reviewed by Diana Butler Bass Conventional analysis of contemporary faith divides the world into two camps of political engagement: liberal secularists, who reject any role for religion in public life, and conservative believers, who strive for a Christian or Muslim state. As a result, discussions on religion and politics degenerate into arguments over excising religion from or adding more religion to public life. Readers who subscribe to this dualistic view will be surprised by "God Is Back." At first glance, the title gives the impression that John Micklethwait and Adrian Wooldridge are arguing for an international faith-based political agenda. But this is a cool-headed book, more analytical than partisan, marked by crisp prose and well-formed insights into politics and policy. Although the authors are sympathetic to religion, they recognize its limits and problems, especially the tensions between fundamentalist forms of Christianity and Islam. While explaining the worldwide renewal of faith, they also examine the flash points of religion and politics. In the end, they criticize both secularists and believers. They argue that the main fault lies not with religion but with the "union of religion and power," used coercively. They urge their readers to move beyond a good/bad view of religion toward a more thoughtful approach that considers the role of churches in strengthening economies, providing meaningful work and reducing poverty. A historical question frames the book: Is modernity hostile to religion? The authors give two answers. First, the French Revolution proposed that religion itself was problematic and that societies should embrace secularism. Second, America's founders envisioned that religious freedom and its resulting competition might foster a healthy interplay of faith and politics in public life. "God Is Back" argues that while Europe has followed the French model of secularism, the American model of religious tolerance seems to be prevailing in the world today. The book opens with an American evangelical-style Bible study in Shanghai, where the pastor proclaims: "In Europe the church is old. Here it is modern. Religion is a sign of higher ideals and progress. Spiritual wealth and material wealth go together. That is why we will win." These words echo the American view that economic prosperity meshes with religious freedom. This vignette supports the book's main point: that religion and modernity are not at odds, that, in the American mode, they can function together to create prosperity and individual freedom. Historians have been making similar arguments for several decades. But "God Is Back" moves beyond the standard analysis to argue that religion offers people a wide range of additional social rewards beyond economic ones, including comfort, community and meaning. Because modern life tends to cut people off from tradition, it creates a longing to reconnect that religion can satisfy. Thus, the more advanced a country becomes, the greater its people's need for faith to fill in the gaps left by cultural change. But the atheists keep asking, Isn't religion the primary source of conflict in the world today? Wouldn't a secular world be less violent? Can radically different religions get along in the modern world? The authors say yes, no and yes. They admit the conflicts but insist that the American model provides a hopeful template for religious pluralism and mutual tolerance. I have a few quibbles with their argument. In the historical sections, they depend too heavily on evangelical historians, thus giving their overview of American religion -- and Christianity in general -- an overwhelmingly Protestant cast. In addition, they accept the theory that people choose religion rationally on the basis of its social benefits; this is a hotly debated topic in religious studies. As journalists, however, Micklethwait and Wooldridge excel: Their eye for detail, ability to see the other side of the story, sense of nuance and irony are all highly developed. "God is Back" is an intelligent account of contemporary religion and the role it might play in making the modern world more open, tolerant and peaceful. In the end, the authors confess that their basic message "is a profoundly liberal one." Complete religious freedom -- including the freedom to reject religion -- is the best human path to the future. To that it can be hoped that people say: Amen.
Copyright 2009, The Washington Post. All Rights Reserved.
Book Description
Two Economist writers show how and why religion is booming around the world and reveal its vast effects on the global economy, politics, and moreOn the street and in the corridors of power, religion is surging worldwide. From Russia to Turkey to India, nations that swore off faith in the last century—or even tried to stamp it out—are now run by avowedly religious leaders. Formerly secular conflicts like the one in Palestine have taken on an overtly religious cast.
God Is Back shines a bright light on this hidden world of faith, from exorcisms in São Paulo to religious skirmishing in Nigeria, to televangelism in California and house churches in China.
Since the Enlightenment, intellectuals have assumed that modernization would kill religion—and that religious America is an oddity. As
God Is Back argues, religion and modernity can thrive together, and America is becoming the norm. Many things helped spark the global revival of religion, including the failure of communism and the rise of globalism. But, above all, twenty-first century religion is being fueled by a very American emphasis on competition and a customer- driven approach to salvation. These qualities have characterized this country’s faith ever since the Founders separated church and state, creating a religious free market defined by entrepreneurship, choice, and personal revelation. As market forces reshape the world, the tools and ideals of American evangelism are now spreading everywhere.
The global rise of faith will have a dramatic and far- reaching impact on our century. Indeed, its destabilizing effects can already be seen far from Iraq or the World Trade Center. Religion plays a role in civil wars from Sri Lanka to Sudan. Along the tenth parallel, from West Africa to the Philippines, religious fervor and political unrest are reinforcing each other.
God Is Back concludes by showing how the same American ideas that created our unique religious style can be applied around the globe to channel the rising tide of faith away from volatility and violence.