I just wonder why 逻辑 didn't complain about the English word "revolution" , as in political overthrow, has nothing to do with the original meaning of the "revolution" as in periodic repetition of movement. These two meanings just don't connect logically. Isn't English ambiguous? At least the Chinese language clearly differentiate between 革命 and 旋转。And 革命 is much closer to the meaning of political overthrow.