| I pointed out the contradictio |
| 送交者: EmitEht 2008月10月23日07:47:23 於 [五 味 齋] 發送悄悄話 |
| 回 答: 轉一篇老共最新解釋土地流轉的文章，大家評論吧。 由 cuckcoocu 於 2008-10-22 20:38:17 |
|
n the other day. In the Resolution. On one hand, it says it will ensure peasants'
contract rights; one the other hand, it encourages the transfer of land-user rights. It is true that land use rights are not exactly land contract rights. Transfer of land use rights for a long term is almost the equivalent of transferring the land contract rights. I thought some term limits, such as 5 year per term could resolve the contradiction, but I could not find it in the text of the Resolution. |
|
|
|
|
 | |||
|
 |
| 實用資訊 | |
|
|
|
|
| 一周點擊熱帖 | 更多>> |
|
|
|
| 一周回復熱帖 |
|
|
| 歷史上的今天：回復熱帖 |
| 2007: | 我“看” 色戒 | |
| 2007: | 隆重介紹一下藏餐 | |
| 2006: | 我和蚊子的故事 | |
| 2006: | 郵票中的童年（1）--- 童年的遊戲 （增 | |
| 2005: | 颶風吹掉美國人的褲衩，驚掉中國人的下 | |
| 2005: | 佳人亂世（12）----土匪匪友情義無價 | |
| 2004: | 一個寧波人眼中的北京和上海 | |
| 2004: | 雲收雨散 -- 引 | |
| 2003: | 浪漫之都--法國巴黎 | |
| 2003: | 電影筆記◎四個女人的故事 | |
