伊斯兰堡，巴基斯坦— 按照约定，中国将立即为巴基斯坦提供50架枭龙（巴基斯坦人称为JF-17)战斗机， 这是巴基斯坦总理Yousaf Raza Gilani这周访问北京的主要成果，巴基斯坦官员们星期四说道。
 
评论翻译:
A评论：（每个评论下面都有许多回复，就直接列在每个评论的下面，每个评论前面我都会表个字母）。
   
[–]boomer56 104 points 13 hours ago*
Also, an attack on Pakistan is an attack on China.
Edit: The more I think about this, the more incredible this policy change becomes...China guaranteeing Pakistani security? What is India thinking tonight?

我越想，这个政策。。。。中国担保巴基斯坦的安全？印度今天会想什么？

Isentrope 18 points 9 hours ago
It's not really much of a policy change and India has known this for a long while. Pakistan and China have very strong relations with one another and China has openly sent material and weapons to Pakistan to aid in fighting India.

这个政策并不会改变多少，印度明白这个很久了。中国和巴基斯坦彼此有很牢固的关系，中国公开送原材料和武器给巴基斯坦用来对抗印度。

[–]ashray 12 points 7 hours ago
Including Nukes. This was alleged for a long time but recently confirmed based on some de-classification. The Wikipedia article on it has this info:

包括核武器，这已经被宣扬很长时间了，但是最近才根据一些文件确认，维基百科上的文章有些信息。

[–]princeton_cuppa 4 points 3 hours ago
exactly, pak nukes = made in china pak exists because of hatred of india which china feeds since it hates India/US/Japan - practically anything which can potentially kicks China's butt.

正确，巴基斯坦的核武器=中国制造。巴基斯坦的存在是因为中国培养的对印度的仇恨，自从中国讨厌印度/美国/日本-实际上无论什么事都可能用来踢中国的屁股。

Isentrope 1 point 19 seconds ago
China's hatred for India stems from when they had a hardline Prime Minister in the late '50s early '60s (Nehru I think? Not sure about that). Prior to this the two countries actually had extremely good relations, but the political shift occurred after Tibet was occupied by the PLA; prior to that, one of the intentions of having Tibet be independent in the first place was to act as a buffer between China and India the same way Nepal and Bhutan function.
Chinese hatred for Japan is pretty self explanatory, and Chinese hatred for the US has died down in recent years out of more of a desire to emulate the US' success.

中国对印度的憎恨源于当时的印度有一个强硬派总理，在50年代后期和60年代的初期（我猜是尼赫鲁？但是不确认）。在这之前这两个国家有非常好的关系，但是政策突然发生变化在西藏被人民解放军占领以后；在此之前，印度支持让西藏独立的目的之一起初是让西藏像尼泊尔和不丹一样作为两国之间的缓冲区。

中国对日本的憎恨纯粹就是不需要解释的，中国对美国的憎恨是由于希望模仿美国的成功当美国在最近几年开始逐渐没落的时候。

B.评论：
       
petewilko 38 points 11 hours ago
Nothing new, India and China continue to have issues with each other. Anytime you hear of some military airplanes India acquires, usually you'll find its range is able of a round trip to Beijing.

没有新意，印度和中国互相总是有矛盾。你听到的所有关于印度获得的一些关于战斗机的消息，我们会发现这些战斗机的航程能够到北京飞一个来回。

[–]itcouldbe 34 points 10 hours ago
The PRC seems to have issues with all its neighbors.

中国似乎与他所有的邻居都有矛盾。

[–]gsfgf 14 points 4 hours ago
It's between Russia and India. Anyone would have neighbor issues.

这是俄罗斯与印度之间的问题，大家与邻居都有矛盾。

[–]Tornado54 3 points 2 hours ago
Really? why would anyone have issues with India again?

真的？为什么大家与印度总有矛盾？

[–]314R8 3 points 2 hours ago
and what about Taiwan, Japan, Korea, phillipines etc? How come China has issues with all of them? (I can see the historic issue with Japan, but what about the others?)
Maybe China does not like it's democratic neighbors? or the problem IS China

对于台湾，日本，韩国，菲律宾怎么样？中国怎么和它们都有矛盾？（我知道日本是因为历史原因，但是其他呢？）
中国可能不喜欢他的民主邻居们？或者说问题在中国。

[–]ofisnothavedamnit 3 points 53 minutes ago
Issues with Taiwan are no surprise really. The guy who Mao drove out to make modern China retreated to Taiwan and the rest of the world defended him there. Not only that, but PRC wasn't recognized as a country for a long period of time by US and Europe and instead the government in Taiwan was recognized as a the Chinese government. There is a lot of history to Chinese relations with its neighbors and it is definitely not an issue of China just blindly hating democracies. After all, Pakistan is technically a democracy and borders China and they seem to have pretty amicable relations.
By the way, I am not taking sides on any of those conflicts. They were all pretty complicated.

和台湾有矛盾真的一点都不令人惊讶。被毛泽东逐出的那帮人让近代中国撤退到台湾，世界上其他的国家都帮他们保卫台湾。不仅如此，中华人民共和国很长时间都不被美国和欧洲承认，作为代替，台湾政府被认为是中国政府。这里有很多关于中国和他邻居矛盾关系的历史，而不是中国只是盲目的恨民主。毕竟，巴基斯坦也是一个民主国家，而且还跟中国接壤，他们看起来非常友好。顺便说一下，我并没有偏袒任何一方，他们之间太复杂了。

[–]314R8 1 point 20 minutes ago
Pakistan's only China border is via Pakistan Occupied Kashmir. But yes, China has good relations with one of its neighbors - Pakistan. Yippee

巴基斯坦和中国唯一的边界是被巴基斯坦占领的克什米尔。能确定的是，中国和巴基斯坦有很好的关系。欢呼！

C评论：
[–]timoleon 5 points 3 days ago
I'd be more concerned with the price Pakistan will have to pay for such diplomatic niceties. More territorial concessions perhaps?

permalink
 parent
 我更关心巴基斯坦为此付出的代价。领土的让步？

[–]spoonybard326 19 points 3 days ago
I'm guessing the price they paid has something to do with pictures of helicopter wreckage.

permalink
 parent
我猜他们付出的代价跟那架直升机碎片的照片有关（译者注：美军打死拉丹掉的那架改装的黑鹰直升机）

[–]nibblerslitterbox 11 points 3 days ago
Pictures, pieces, whole parts. Bingo.

permalink
 parent
照片，残片，整个部分，你说中了

[–]Druuseph 8 points 3 days ago
To be honest the helicopter is not really that important. The modifications to it were simply noise reducing, it's unlikely there was any kind of radar shielding besides a smoothed nose. It was more than likely nothing more than a Navy version of a Black Hawk with the tail replaced, it's not some super futuristic death-copter and as shown the modifications weren't exactly the best considering the damn thing lost balance when it went to hover. I know a few engineers who work for Sikorsky and when they were looking at that tail they nearly fell out of their chair wondering who though that was a good idea. A fifth blade and a covering on the middle completely changes the stabilizing capacity, it's not optimal for that body. If they really wanted a 'stealth' helicopter they should have looked into creating something similar to the Comanche which has a covered fan that provides more torque while reducing noise.
Now what they might want is the avionics that may have survived the explosion, that is true, but the 'stealth' tech is not nearly as high tech or incredible as it's being made out to be.

permalink
 parent

诚实来讲，直升机还不值那么多钱。改装的直升机只是简单的减少了噪音。不可能有雷达干扰设备除开光滑的机头。跟海军的黑鹰直升机差别不大，只是尾翼被取代了。这并不是超级未来的牛逼直升机，只是简单的修改而且还没有考虑到特殊情况以至于盘旋的时候失去了平衡。我认识一些为SIKORSKY公司工作的工程师，当他们看到这个尾巴时，他们几乎离开了椅子想知道谁想的馊主意。第五个直升机的叶片和在中间的覆盖物彻底改变了直升机的稳定性，这并不是最佳的改造对于这款直升机来说。如果他们真的想要隐形直升机，他们应该创造一个类似于科曼奇能够覆盖住螺旋桨并能提供更大的扭矩而且能缩减噪音。
他们想要的只可能是在爆炸中幸免于难的航空电子设备，这是对的，但是隐形技术远非被制造成的那么高科技或者那么不可置信的。
我甚至怀疑他们能够得到航空电子设备，因为就我所看的消息，他们花了很多时间去破坏直升机，甚至超过他们寻找目标（这里的他们是指美国海军陆战队）

[–]recycle_bin 1 point 3 days ago
The skin likely had the latest stealthy paint in the US arsenal since this was a very new and still classified helicopter. Paint chips are probably the most important piece of the helicopter to China since it could advance their stealth program and perhaps lead to developing countermeasures to detect US stealth planes. The stealthy shape of the helicopter could be recreated in house in little time, but the R&D behind the paint could bring their stealth forward a decade or more from where they are today.

permalink
 parent

表皮像是在美国军工里最新的隐性涂料，因为这是一个非常新，仍旧机密的直升机。对中国来说，隐形涂料的碎片是最重要的，因为这可以促进他们的隐形项目，可能发展对策来侦察美国的隐形飞机。直升机的形状可以在房子里用很少的时间来重新制造，但是涂料后面的R&D能够让他们的隐形技术提升十年或者更多。

[–]p3on 0 points 2 days ago
i can literally guarantee that the helicopters did not have stealth paint. they flew into pakistan literally under the radar. they were entirely undetectable by radar to begin with.permalinkparent

我担保直升机并没有涂隐形涂料，他们在雷达下飞进了巴基斯坦，从一开始他们就不会被雷达发现。

[–]p3on 0 points 2 days ago
radar literally does not detect anything below about 2-300 feet, even in flat terrain (which abottabad is not)

permalink
 parent

雷达并不能侦察在200-300米下的低空，甚至在平坦的地形。

D,评论

haphapablap 11 points 3 days ago
(China Gives Pakistan 50 Fighter Jets). What a dishonest title. From the article "China and Pakistan have jointly produced the JF-17 aircraft" JOINTLY PRODUCING is not one side GIVING something to another.

这标题太假了，从“中国和巴基斯坦联合生产枭龙战机”的标题，联合生产的意思不是一方给一方。

permalink

[–]Vnotforvendetta 5 points 3 days ago
it is when china is paying for/manufacturing these particular 50 fighters

permalink
 parent

这是中国额外为这50架飞机支付的。

[–]n99bJedi 13 points 3 days ago
Pakistan didn't paid for it, China paid for them. and they are under Pak control... so yes, that would conclude to the title "China gives Pak 50 Fighter Jets". China's technology is far superior than Pak (if that even exists on a global level).
This can be easily explained by this analogy -
Tom and Dick jointly made cookies. Tom bought the dough, the sugar, the syrup, the chips the bowls, template cutters etc. He then also brought his mommas secret recipe that is known to only his family, to his backyard. Only a few other people in this world can make those special cookies like his mothers favorite cookies. Dick on the other hand, came. Tom then went ahead and followed the recipe. Tom and Dick both 'made' cookies, and then Tom gave them to Dick to take them home.

permalink
 parent

巴基斯坦并不付钱，付钱的是中国。他们在巴基斯坦的控制下。所以标题应该是“中国给巴基斯坦50架飞机”。中国的技术远超巴基斯坦。